28;
P.L. Ford, _The Association of the First Congress_, in
_Political Science Quarterly_, VI. 615-7.
[3] Cf., e.g., Arthur Lee's letter to R.H. Lee, March 18,
1774, in which non-intercourse is declared "the only advisable
and sure mode of defence": Force, _American Archives_, 4th
Ser., I. 229. Cf. also _Ibid._, p. 240; Ford, in _Political
Science Quarterly_, VI. 614-5.
[4] Goodloe, _Birth of the Republic_, p. 260.
[5] Staples, _Annals of Providence_ (1843), p. 235.
[6] Force, _American Archives_, 4th Ser., I. 735. This was
probably copied from the Virginia resolve.
[7] Force, _American Archives_, 4th Ser., I. 600.
[8] _Ibid._, I. 494, 530. Cf. pp. 523, 616, 641, etc.
[9] _Ibid._, I. 687.
[10] _Ibid._, I. 511, 526. Cf. also p. 316.
[11] _Journals of Cong._, I. 20. Cf. Ford, in _Political
Science Quarterly_, VI. 615-7.
[12] John Adams, _Works_, II. 382.
[13] _Journals of Cong._, I. 21.
[14] _Ibid._, I. 24; Drayton; _Memoirs of the American
Revolution_, I. 147; John Adams, _Works_, II. 394.
[15] _Journals of Cong._, I. 27, 32-8.
[16] Danbury, Dec. 12, 1774: Force, _American Archives_, 4th
Ser., I. 1038. This case and that of Georgia are the only ones
I have found in which the slave-trade clause was specifically
mentioned.
Pages:
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99